<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox &#8211; Attack of the Cookies !</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neerajtikku.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/firefox-attack-of-the-cookies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neerajtikku.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/firefox-attack-of-the-cookies/</link>
	<description>state of lacking thoughts effortlessly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neeraj</title>
		<link>http://neerajtikku.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/firefox-attack-of-the-cookies/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>Neeraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 06:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neerajtikku.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/firefox-attack-of-the-cookies/#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;or even be asked about each cookie (very annoying, though)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is exactly my point Marcoos. Though undoubtedly FF is way ahead of IE as far as spam-protection is concerned. But I cannot block cookies since most of the sites requires them [even wordpress requires cookies to be enabled]. 

Maybe I was wrong in saying “so much for Firefox being a safe browser” in general, but then cookies are really the pain-in-the-a$$, atleast for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>or even be asked about each cookie (very annoying, though)</p></blockquote>
<p>That is exactly my point Marcoos. Though undoubtedly FF is way ahead of IE as far as spam-protection is concerned. But I cannot block cookies since most of the sites requires them [even wordpress requires cookies to be enabled]. </p>
<p>Maybe I was wrong in saying “so much for Firefox being a safe browser” in general, but then cookies are really the pain-in-the-a$$, atleast for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcoos</title>
		<link>http://neerajtikku.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/firefox-attack-of-the-cookies/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>marcoos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 22:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neerajtikku.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/firefox-attack-of-the-cookies/#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>You can block cookies in Firefox. You can also block cookies from some sites and not from the others or even be asked about each cookie (very annoying, though).

So, I don&#039;t think that &quot;so much for FireFox being a safe browser&quot; is justified here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can block cookies in Firefox. You can also block cookies from some sites and not from the others or even be asked about each cookie (very annoying, though).</p>
<p>So, I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;so much for FireFox being a safe browser&#8221; is justified here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
