This, you can say, is the part of my earlier post, “Kind of blogs I hate” !
Though for me all the comments that I recieved are as precious, albeit there is one which I would like to point out:
Hi:
I just failed one item, and that is “Read More�. The reason I do it, is to help bloggers who are short on bandwidth. My first page is very simple, with only one small image to give the reader a hint of what will be covered in the next page where the real stuff is.
It never occurred to me, people would have an issue with one click, but now I know better. Hmmm. What will I do to help those surfing with an Internet speed of 56 KB? I’ll think of something.
The rest of your points are well taken and I agree with all of them.
Just my two cents worth.
Omar.-
Omar, I completely respect what you wrote [so I get to keep these 2 cents]. So I guess I need to come clean on this one.
There is another reason I don’t like “Read More” links, that is apart from me being a fcuking lazy, which is very simple.
Say you keep 10 entries on your main page, each entry having “Read More” link. Now I am just browsing your site and want to read all the entries since I like the text before “Read More” link.
What does that mean ?? I will have to click “Read More” 10 times and not to mention 9 times I’ll have to click “Back” button. That counts to 19 extra clicks for reading 10 articles [going by this calculations, what I wrote in my earlier entry about 1 click, looks like the understatement of the year].
Now instead of that, say you keep latest 5 complete entries on your page. So to read 10 entries I’ll have to click just once more. And I believe loading 10 “Read More” pages would take more time and bandwidth to load as compared to 2 pages with 5 entries each.
This, I agree, is based one simple rule that I follow. If someone is not going to like first 3 lines of your first two entry he/she is not going take pain of reading anymore.
WISHING ALL A VERY HAPPY & PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR